They also point out that electors are free to vote however they wish and claim that the electoral college makes it impossible for third-party and independent …

Unfortunately, that won't be easy because 38 states will have to agree, and some smaller states may want to preserve their disproportionate share of power. The Electoral College ensures that all the states have a voice in the national election. It is impossible for a politician to gain the 270 votes needed to win the election by just concentrating on the states with the largest population or just one region.

As 538 party officials around the country prepare to cast their electoral votes on Monday to formally elect Donald Trump the 45th president, the question whether the Electoral College should … http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/media/blogs/blog/21/electoral_chart.gif. 1 Our Needs Have Changed. The closest the United States has come to abolishing the Electoral College occurred during the 91st Congress (1969–1971). The electoral college has always had strong opponents who have argued that it should be abolished. There would need to be a Constitutional amendment if the compact idea doesn’t work. Their reasons include the fact that, under certain circumstances, a president can be elected without winning the majority of electoral votes. The presidential election of 1968 resulted in Richard Nixon receiving 301 electoral votes (56% of electors), Hubert Humphrey 191 (35.5%), and George Wallace 46 (8.5%) with 13.5% of the popular vote. The pros and cons of abolishing the Electoral College must go beyond the 65% of people who want it gone. People deserve to have their votes matter, so the Electoral College should be abolished to allow the American people the full ability to be able to pick their leader under Democracy. If the Electoral College is abolished, all voters will be equally important, as they should be. The Electoral College was created by our founding fathers as a part of “The Great Compromise”. The world and our nation was quite different back in the late 1700’s when this process came to play. That is a laborious process and a constitutional amendment to abolish the Electoral College would require significant consensus—at least two … The Electoral College can and should be abolished by a Constitutional Amendment. People who think we should keep the Electoral College say that the system prevents tyranny of the majority and allows for a greater diversity of interests to be represented in the … The Republicans tend to lean more to keeping the system, but for the most part it is unflavored. Last, but certainly not least, the Electoral College needs to be abolished simply because our needs have changed. The Electoral College should be abolished to become an equal election. It’s time to look to the future. Unlike the Democratic Party push to abolish the Electoral College, which would take a constitutional amendment, the Newt Gingrich-endorsed compact preserves it, but lessens its power.

There were two parts to this. It also ensures that a candidate runs a national, rather than a regional, campaign.

In conclusion the Electoral College discriminates, violates democratic principles, and is ultimately unfair. Because the procedure for electing the president is part of the Constitution, a Constitutional Amendment (which requires two-thirds approval in both houses of Congress plus approval by 38 states) would be required to abolish the Electoral College.

With the divide between Democrats and Republicans currently in place, the likelihood that this idea will receive any movement any time soon is quite minimal.